重庆社会科学

全要素生产率是推动高质量发展的动力源泉,对于提高资源配置效率和优化体制机制建设具有重要作用。利用2008—2017年我国科普投入产出的面板数据,基于DEA-Malmquist模型测算我国省际科普全要素生产率的时空差异,分析科普全要素生产率的收敛性。得出如下主要结论:在样本期内,我国科普全要素生产率非有效,波动性大,且规模效应是推动科普全要素生产率提高的主要原因,纯技术效率相对较弱。在地区差异上,我国省际科普全要素生产率呈现由东至西递减的趋势,差异明显。经济越发达的地区,科普全要素生产率相对较高。且我国科普全要素生产率并不存在显著的α收敛,但是存在绝对β收敛和相对β收敛,科普全要素生产率低的省份存在向科普全要素生产率高的省份"追赶效应"。根据以上研究发现,有助于厘清我国科普工作的内在规律,更加清晰省际科普投入产出效率之间的差距,对于更合理配置科普资源,提高资源利用效具有借鉴意义和指导价值。

Improving total factor productivity is the driving force of promoting high quality development, and plays an important role in improving the efficiency of resource allocation and optimizing the construction of institutional mechanism. This paper calculated the temporal and spatial differences of the total factor productivity of science popularization based on the DEA-Malmquist model by the data from2008 to 2017. On this basis, this paper also calculated the convergence of total factor productivity of science popularization. The following are the main conclusions: in the sample period, the total factor productivity of science popularization in China is not effective, the volatility is large, and the scale effect is the main reason to promote the total factor productivity of science popularization, and the pure technical efficiency is relatively weaker. In terms of regional differences, the total factor productivity of popular science among provinces in China shows a decreasing trend from east to west, and the difference is obvious. The more developed the economy, the total factor productivity of science popularization is relatively higher. There is no significant α convergence in the total factor productivity of science popularization in China, but there is absolute β convergence and relative β convergence, and the provinces with lower total factor productivity of science popularization have "catch-up effect" to the provinces with higher total factor productivity of science popularization. According to the above research, it is helpful to clarify the internal operation rule of science popularization, and to clarify the gap between interprovincial science popularization input and output.