| 1,508 | 12 | 16 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
功利主义的目的是实现人的最大幸福,避免痛苦,与经验主义的方法有紧密的关系。它重视研究和识别人的行为,坚信人们可以认识行为的趋向。功利主义深刻影响着人们的道德观、法律观,为人们认识法律现象提供了新思路和新视角。马克思恩格斯意识到了功利主义对法律现象产生的重要影响,一定程度上肯定了功利主义法学观的历史意义,同时从本质、方法、价值三个角度揭示了它的历史局限,指出功利主义法学观依然未能超越时代赋予它们的限制。马克思恩格斯对功利主义法学观的三重批判对当前我国的法治建设具有重要的启示。我国的法治建设需要重视经验,但要警惕对经验的过度迷恋。对法律现象的认识,既要充分重视经验,又要注重抽象力,辩证地分析中国的法治建设,积极构建我国的法治话语体系。
Abstract:The purpose of utilitarianism is to achieve the greatest happiness and avoid suffering,which is closely related to empiricism. It attaches great importance to the study and identification of human behavior, and firmly believes that people can recognize the trend of behavior. Utilitarianism profoundly influences people’s moral and legal concepts, and provides new ideas and perspectives for people to understand legal phenomena. Marx and Engels realized the important influence of utilitarianism on legal phenomena, affirmed to a certain extent the historical significance of utilitarianism legal concept, and at the same time revealed its historical limitations from three perspectives of essence, method and value,pointing out that some viewpoints adhered to by utilitarianism legal concept still failed to surpass the limitations of the times. Marx and Engels’ triple criticism of the utilitarian legal concept has important enlightenment for the current construction of the rule of law in China. Our country’s rule of law construction needs to attach importance to experience, but we should be alert to excessive infatuation with experience. To understand legal phenomena, we should not only attach great importance to experience, but also to abstraction. We should dialectically analyze the construction of rule of law in China and actively construct the discourse system of rule of law in our country.
[1]张华夏.道德哲学与经济系统分析[M].北京:人民出版社,2010:89-90.
[2]Derek.P.H.Allen,The Utilitarianism of Makx and Engels[J].American Philosophical Quarterly,Vol.10,No.3,Jul.1973:189.
[3]杨松,韦庭学.马克思主义伦理观是功利主义吗?——德里克·艾伦与布伦克特的争论评析[J].马克思主义与现实,2017(6):107-114.
[4]丁成际.马克思主义视阈中的功利观[J].毛泽东邓小平理论研究,2009(6):71-75+86.
[5]喻中.恩格斯“英国宪法”对宪政研究的启示[J].马克思主义研究,2007(4):47-52.
[6]白春雨.马克思与功利主义[J].马克思主义与现实,2012(4):62-68.
[7]姚大志.当代功利主义哲学[J].世界哲学,2012(2):50-61+161.
[8]边沁.道德与立法原理导论[M].时殷弘,译.北京:商务印书馆,2011.
[9]边沁.政府片论[M].沈淑平,译.北京:商务印书馆,1995.
[10]张伟.浅谈密尔个性自由主义功利思想[J].重庆社会科学,2005(2):59-62.
[11]徐同远.边沁的功利主义理论与分析法学思想[J].比较法研究,2008(6):119-130.
[12]乔洪武,师远志.正义的不平等与不正义的不平等——功利主义、新自由主义和西方马克思主义的不平等思想评析[J].马克思主义研究,2015(6):93-100+160.
[13]富勒.法律的道德性[M].郑戈,译.北京:商务印书馆,2005:3.
[14]John Austin,Lectures on Jurisprudence or the Philosophy of Positive Law[M],5th ed.Recised and Edited by Robert Campbell,Lodon:John Murray.1885,vol.I,p:85-86
[15]马克思恩格斯文集:第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[16]马克思恩格斯全集:第3卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[17]马克思恩格斯文集:第9卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[18]马克思恩格斯文集:第2卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[19]左卫民.一场新的范式革命?——解读中国法律实证研究[J].清华法学,2017(3):45-61.
[20]习近平.在哲学社会科学工作座谈会上的讲话[N].人民日报,2016-05-19(002).
基本信息:
DOI:10.19631/j.cnki.css.2019.03.003
中图分类号:D90;D920.0
引用信息:
[1]徐晓.马克思恩格斯对功利主义法学观的批判及当代启示[J].重庆社会科学,2019,No.292(03):31-40.DOI:10.19631/j.cnki.css.2019.03.003.
基金信息:
河南省哲学社会科学规划项目“中国特色社会主义法治文化基础理论研究”(2016BFX015)
2019-04-16
2019-04-16
2019-04-16