| 1,605 | 2 | 672 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
生成式人工智能颠覆性变革知识内容生产方式并成为驱动千行百业创新发展的关键力量,探讨其数据训练过程的版权问题,可为人工智能规范发展提供政策借鉴。从版权侵权表征、版权保护对象及国际通行的豁免规则等方面深入探究生成式人工智能版权保护与豁免的辩证关系。研究发现,版权侵权问题可能遍历生成式人工智能运作的各阶段,应加强对传统资源数字化和原创数字内容的版权保护,务实的做法是通过豁免规则在发展中落实保护。并且,基于问题导向剖析欧盟、英国、日本的版权法律豁免规则,考察国际实践经验发现,各国的具体做法是设立“TDM例外”规则,中国可借鉴相关做法,在现行法律框架下嵌入基于特定行为目的的例外规则,从而兼顾版权保护与创新发展。
Abstract:Generative artificial intelligence has disrupted the way knowledge content is produced and has become a key force driving innovation and development in various industries. Exploring the copyright issues in its data training process can provide policy references for the standardized development of artificial intelligence. This article delves into the dialectical relationship between copyright protection and exemption for generative artificial intelligence from aspects such as the manifestations of copyright infringement, the objects of copyright protection, and the internationally accepted exemption rules. The research finds that copyright infringement issues may occur at all stages of the operation of generative artificial intelligence. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the copyright protection of traditional resources digitization and original digital content. A practical approach is to implement protection through exemption rules during development. Moreover, based on problem-oriented analysis, this article examines the copyright legal exemption rules of the European Union, the United Kingdom, and Japan, and finds that the specific practices of these countries are to establish "TDM exceptions". China can draw on these practices and embed exception rules based on specific behavioral purposes within the current legal framework to balance copyright protection and innovation development.
[1]习近平在中共中央政治局第九次集体学习时强调加强领导做好规划明确任务夯实基础推动我国新一代人工智能健康发展[N].人民日报,2018-11-01(1).
[2]李白杨,白云,詹希旎,等.人工智能生成内容(AIGC)的技术特征与形态演进[J].图书情报知识,2023(1):66-74.
[3]米加宁.生成式治理:大模型时代的治理新范式[J].中国社会科学,2024(10):119-139,207.
[4]张笑尘.人工智能生成物的可版权性问题——日本经验与中国镜鉴[J].现代日本经济,2025(1):81-94.
[5] PEUKERT C, WINDISCH M. The economics of copyright in the digital age[J]. Journal of Economic Surveys,2025(3):877-903.
[6] LEHR D , OHM P. Playing with the data:What legal scholars should learn about machine learning[J]. UC Davis Law Review, 2017(2):653-717.
[7]商建刚.数据训练的著作权法分析[J].法学论坛,2025(2):68-78.
[8]黄汇,翟鹏威.公共领域视野下大模型数据使用行为的著作权定性[J].知识产权,2025(1):94-110.
[9]闻天吉.驳人工智能“创作工具说”[J].知识产权,2024(1):85-105.
[10]黄玉烨,杨依楠.论生成式人工智能版权侵权“双阶”避风港规则的构建[J].知识产权,2024(11):37-58.
[11]单晓光.新科技革命背景下人工智能知识产权问题的立体因应[J].知识产权,2025(1):33-50.
[12]熊琦,张文窈.人工智能生成内容著作权规制的全球趋向与本土路径[J].知识产权,2024(11):59-76.
[13]蔡琳.生成式人工智能语料来源可追溯义务的法律构造[J].江苏社会科学,2025(2):161-169,243-244.
[14]陆小华,陆赛赛.人工智能侵权中过错要件的再思考——以“合理的人工智能”为标准[J].河北法学,2025(5):93-114.
[15]李旭光,胡奕,王曼,等.人工智能生成内容研究综述:应用、风险与治理[J].图书情报工作,2024(17):136-149.
[16]中国信息通信研究院,京东探索研究院.人工智能生成内容(AIGC)白皮书(2022年)[R/OL].(2022-09-02)[2025-04-15].https://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/bps/202209/P020220902534520798735.pdf.
[17]尤丽娜,周诗涵,周荣庭.“AIGC+”:虚拟现实媒介内容生产机制研究[J].出版科学,2024(3):32-41.
[18]马羽男.生成式人工智能的风险与治理——以ChatGPT为例[N].中国社会科学报,2024-05-15(7).
[19] KAPLAN J, MC CANDLISH S, HENIGHAN T, et al. Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models.[R/OL].(2020-01-23)[2025-04-24].https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.08361.
[20]祝建军.生成式人工智能著作权侵权问题研究[J].知识产权,2025(2):44-60.
[21]中国信息通信研究院知识产权与创新发展中心.人工智能知识产权法律问题研究报告(2023年)[R/OL].(2023-12-14)[2025-04-17].https://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/ztbg/202312/P020231214536394565312.pdf.
[22]罗娇,张晓林.支持文本与数据挖掘的著作权法律政策建议[J].中国图书馆学报,2018(3):21-34.
[23]吴高,黄晓斌.人工智能时代文本与数据挖掘合理使用规则设计研究[J].图书情报工作,2021(22):3-13.
[24]李开复,陈楸帆. AI未来进行式[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,2022:20.
[25]徐小奔,薛少雄.生成式人工智能服务提供者版权注意义务的法律构造[J].科技与出版,2024(7):48-58.
[26]吴何奇,方正.生成式人工智能涉著作权犯罪的归责思路[N].检察日报,2025-04-09(3).
[27]陈传夫,汪晓方,符玉霜.国外版权图书馆员岗位设置及其对我国的启示[J].国家图书馆学刊,2009(2):39-42.
[28]邱奉捷.国内外图书馆数字资源共建共享版权解决实践调研[J].图书馆学研究,2017(11):92-97.
[29]寿步.人工智能生成内容:可版权性和版权人问题[J].科技与法律(中英文),2024(4):60-72.
[30] JOHNSON G A, SHRIVER S K, GOLDBERG S G. Privacy and market concentration:intended and unintended consequences of the GDPR[J].Management Science, 2023(10):5695-5721.
[31] THONGMEENSUK S. Rethinking copyright exceptions in the era of Generative AI:Balancing innovation and intellectual property protection[J]. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 2024(2):278-295.
[32]张凌寒.人工智能法律治理的路径拓展[J].中国社会科学,2025(1):91-110 ,206.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19631/j.cnki.css.2025.007.001
中图分类号:D923.41
引用信息:
[1]刘诚.生成式人工智能数据训练的版权保护及其国际经验[J].重庆社会科学,2025,No.368(07):6-17.DOI:10.19631/j.cnki.css.2025.007.001.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金项目“平台经济的市场竞争与资源配置效率研究”(23BJY059)
2025-07-30
2025-07-30